This week two questions were asked: “what is poverty?” and “what causes poverty?”
My knee-jerk, smart-ass response to that was: Poverty is caused by sitting around asking these questions.
Talk about the kettle calling the pot black being a philosophy major. Meaning I specialize in asking questions and not going much further than that.
But really, it is an interesting topic to an extent. Also, I have to react in some way to someone who wrote “capitalism” as the thing that causes poverty. I intend to start with “what is poverty” though, I am a philosophy major, defining words is my thing.
Poverty, I think, is instability if one goes to the very root of poverty although I think the better phrasing is “lack of stability.” (Yes, I do in fact enjoy going that deep into phrasing.)
I say this because lacking stability leads to a feeling of no control and probably a relatively poor environment (physical, emotional, psychological). These things then cause some form of hopelessness meaning no planning for the future or minimal planning for the future. That leads to certain mindsets which just continue this terrible cycle. I like plant analogies so, in this situation, poverty would basically be lack of stable soil/water/sunlight for a seed. Take those things away and a seed probably will not grow and, if they are of poor quality, that seed may grow but not to its full potential.
I say this because, without some sort of stability, some sort of solid ground, it is impossible to make any leaps, any leaps of faith. Those leaps of faith are the things required to be and feel successful (just run with me on that for sake of argument please). Think of all of the assumptions made on a daily basis by an individual 1) there will be a tomorrow that they will wake up to 2) their living shelter will still exist and still be theirs 3) they will wake up in good enough health to get to work 4) they will still have work to go to or have the ability to find work 5) they can or will get some sort of food/nourishment. The alarm has not even been turned off yet and we have 5 assumptions! Plenty more get made once you sit down and think about it. Not being able to make these fundamental assumptions leads to instability and loss of control which, I think, leads to a cycle into the usual sort of poverty of lacking money etc.
The problem is, how do we promote that stability required without simply hiding poverty? As in, how do we create something that helps someone create their own stable environments without simply creating a fake stability and thus helping to create a reliance on the help and then generational poverty? Somehow we have to figure out how to help someone build their own permanent stability where there is none or very little to start out with.
STOP what you’re thinking. This is not a critique of current programs that exist or anything, I am simply pursuing a line of thought that is not often discussed openly (at least not in the circles I frequent). Instead of critiquing government etc., what if I threw the responsibility back to you, as an individual and member of society?
Instead of waiting for a government program to come and help solve poverty without you, as a citizen and possibly neighbor to someone needing help, doing anything, maybe it is time to think about how you, since you are right there, can help create stability for your neighbor. You, as the person on the ground, can actually see where stability is most lacking and are closest at hand to help that other person actually begin to find stability or create stability. As an actual face too, that person is less likely to become reliant on you because humans are proud individuals and having to look at someone constantly that they owe will help them want to get free of that “owing” and return the favor in the best way that they can. Not saying you ought to look for something from that person but, their want for their own individual pride, can help make sure they do not become reliant on you for stability; something that a vague program simply cannot do. Just saying, next time you want to critique a vague program of any sort: what part have you had with it and what are you doing to fix those problems you are critiquing?